MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2377726271

The Analysis of Error for an Algorithm of Privacy-preserving Rule Mining

2007· article· en· W2377726271 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bo Zhong

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrocomputer applications · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Mining Algorithms and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceTransformation (genetics)Set (abstract data type)Expression (computer science)AlgorithmData miningComputationApproximation errorDatabase transactionData setData transformationProbability of errorArtificial intelligenceData warehouseDatabase
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We analyze the transformation probability which affects the accuracy of privacy preserving data mining algorithm in[1],and give the expression between the transformation probability and accuracy of the algorithm.We also show that,under the condition that the number of transaction of data set is 10000 and the percentage of selected transactions is no less than 10%,the relative error of this expression,i.e.,error produced by the algorithm comparing with the expected error is no more than 6%.Through computations we demonstrate that with the size of data set increasing,the relative error of the expression decreases gradually.Hence,this algorithm can be used in practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score0.428

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrocomputer applicationsSame topicData Mining Algorithms and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207