Bibliographic record
Abstract
In our present study, the light curve of Melilotus albus and Melilotus officinalis were measured, and parameters of photosynthesis were simulated by non-rectangle hyperbolae function. Our results showed that:(1) M.officinalis had high maximum net photosynthetic rate(25.94 μmol/m2·s), light saturation point(560.7 μmol/m2·s) and also light compensation point:(27.7 μmol/m2·s).(2) M. albus exhibited higher photo use efficiency under 600 μmol/m2·s attributing to the higher QE(0.075), when the light intensity was 600 μmol/m2·s, M. officinalis also exhibited higher maximum photosynthetic rate.(3) Both gs and Tr showed significant influence on the photo-response curve, however, the sharply increasing in Tr would result from the lower WUE in M. officinalis. In a word, our results revealed that there existed the trade-off relationship between Amax and WUE for both species, e.g. M. officinalis showed higher Amax than M.albus, while M. albus had higher WUE. This may be the results of plant long-term adaptation to environment and forming their own stable survival strategy. Therefore, the more useful for Melilotus species depends on the location environmental conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".