Treatment of cervicogenic headache by stellate ganglion block combined with modified cervical paravertebral nerve block
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of stellate ganglion block(SGB) combined with modified cervical paravertebral nerve block(CPNB) and SGB combined with peripheral nerve block(PNB) in the treatment of cervicogenic headache.Methods A total of 136 patients with cervicogenic headache was randomly divided into two groups with 68 cases each.The patients in group A received SGB combined with CPNB and those in group B received SGB combined with PNB.All patients were treated every other day for four times as a course of treatment.The short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire and reduced range of the motion in the neck(ROM) score were evaluated before and after treatment.Results Compared to before,the pain rating index(PRI),the present pain index(PPI),visual analogue scale(VAS),ROM scores were lower after treatment(P0.05) in two groups.PRI,PPI,VAS,ROM scores were lower and the cure rate was higher in group A than those in group B after treatment(P0.05).Conclusion SGB combined with CPNB is better than SGB combined with PNB in the treatment of cervicogenic headache.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".