MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2378023559

The Contribution of Eco-island:Practice and Experience of Domestic and International Eco-regions

2010· article· en· W2378023559 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueShijie dili yanjiu · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRegional Development and Environment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConnotationChinaGeographySustainable developmentMode (computer interface)Regional scienceEconomyEconomic geographyEconomic growthPolitical scienceEconomicsArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The eco-region has not been clearly defined,while its connotation has never been specifically addressed.After years of practice and research,there have been a number of related ideas and different interpretations.It is a typical mode of regional sustainable development and recycling economy.The practice and research of eco-regions always focus on the coordination of economy,society,resources,environment,and management.In China and abroad,different modes of development are brought forward,on the basis of different location and condition.For instance,Prince Edward Island of Canada is a typical mode of remote region in a developed country.Long Island of the USA is an island near the metropolis New York.Jeju Island of Korea is a free-trade area of a developing country.Hainan Island is also a developing mode.This paper attempts to analyze these different cases of eco-islands in China and abroad,and summarizes the experience to guide Chongming eco-island of Shanghai.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.671
Threshold uncertainty score0.258

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it