CLINICAL APPLICATION AND EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS OF OSTEOARTHRITIS IN KNEES WITH DIACEREIN
Bibliographic record
Abstract
[Objective] To evaluate the efficacy and safety of osteoarthritis in knees with diacerein and diclofenac.[Methods] A total of 108 patients fulfilling the American College of Rheummatolgy criteria for knee OA were enrolled in 17 weeks.The two groups patients were given diacerein and diclofenac for 12 weeks,and followed up for 4 weeks.[Results] After 12 weeks of treatment,the primary criterion [visual ananlog scale(VAS) assessment of pain on walking for 20 metres] was significantly superior(P﹤0.05) to baseline in both groups.Significant improvement(P﹤0.05) was observed for the secondary criterion,which included tenderness on palpation,Western Ontario and McMaster Universities OA index(WOMAC).In the follow-up period,there were no obvious changes in the above parameters of the diacerein group,but in the diclofenac group,pain on walking for 20 metres,tenderness on palpation and WOMAC became worsen after withdrawing the drugs for 4 weeks.[Conclusion] Diacerein showed to be as effective as diclofenac in treating patients with knee OA,and coupled with a carry-over effect.But the diacerein is more effective and is reliable,safety and effectiveness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".