A Study On Technology For Breaking Dormancy of Polygonatum sibiricum Red. Seeds
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to provide technical support for sexual propagation of Polygonatum sibiricum Red,we studied the effects of illumination,sand storage temperature,lukewarm water and exogenous growth regulating substances on the seed germination of Polygonatum sibiricum.The results showed that:Storing at 0 ℃ low-temperature sand under the condition of 120 days was favorite for seed germination;Seed germination rate under dark conditions was 37.78% which was higher than that under illumination of high germination rate,indicating that dark was beneficial for the germination of Polygonatum sibiricum seeds;After soaked 18-24 hours in 35-40 ℃ lukewarm waters,the germination rate of Polygonatum sibiricum seeds reached to 93.33%.Suitable concentration of GA3,6-BA,salicylic acid and chitosan increased the germination of Polygonatum sibiricum seeds significantly,and the germination time shortened remarkably.The concentration for GA3(150 mg/L) seed soaking 24 hours had the best effect,germination rate,germination potential,germination index and vigor index were up to 91.11%,62.22%,0.87 and 5.16,respectively;6-BA(100 mg/L) still can break bud dormancy in addition to promote seed germination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it