Principles and Implementation of Four-quadrant Power Measurement for Electric Power Signals
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Owing to the inability of the power measured with conventional instruments not to correctly reflect the actual power state at the electric energy measuring points, the four-quadrant power measuring principles and implementation for measuring and analyzing the power of electric power signals are proposed. First an in-depth analysis is made of the principles of four-quadrant power measurement, by which the power is analyzed from the point of view of the vector to uniquely determine the true state of electric energy exchange, thus increasing the accuracy and applicability of power measurement. As an effective method for measuring and analyzing the electric power signals, it is applicable not only to power measurement at electric energy measuring points with definite power transmission direction but also to that with variable power transmission direction. Then two implementing methods are given, the indirect method and direct method. Finally, the results of simulation are given, which show that the above-mentioned principles and implementing method are correct and feasible.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it