MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2378442480

MIAO ALBUM:EARLY MODERN CHINA ETHNOGRAPHY

2010· article· en· W2378442480 on OpenAlexaff
Laura Hostetler, Yun Tang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Ethnology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChinese history and philosophy
Canadian institutionsPrevention of Organ Failure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFolkloreEthnographyDiplomacyEmpireChinaPhenomenonHistorySociologyAncient historyLiteratureEthnologyArtPolitical scienceEpistemologyLawPhilosophyArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper offers a detailed analysis of causes, systems of classification, drawing patterns, images, folkloric and religious descriptions related to various versions of the Miao Albums produced in the Qing Empire. It links the albums to knowledge and imagination of the Qing imperial officialdom of the others on its periphery.During the early modern process, i.e. about between 1500 and 1800, various kinds of expanding nations and empires, when expanding, by means of conquering, or direct colonization, or getting help from diplomacy, they collected and noted down the information related with the people who would interact with soon; moreover, the interest of ethnography to Other is not a The West Exclusive phenomenon, but a more extensive early modern nation constructing process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.321
Threshold uncertainty score0.513

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of EthnologySame topicChinese history and philosophyFrench-language works237,207