MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2378494908

Wood Texture Classification Based on LBP-ADABOOST

2015· article· en· W2378494908 on OpenAlexaff
Xiang Don

Bibliographic record

VenueHarbin Ligong Daxue xuebao · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicRemote Sensing and Land Use
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLocal binary patternsAdaBoostArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Support vector machineInvariant (physics)Texture (cosmology)Computer scienceTexture filteringClassifier (UML)MathematicsImage textureHistogramImage processingImage (mathematics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aiming at the issue of low categorization accuracy and tough calamity,based on LBP( local binary)operator and ADABOOST( adaptive enhancement) algorithm theory,a LBP-ADABOOST model on wood texture classification is proposed. By uniform rotation invariant features and the integration of the original LBP operator to extract texture feature values,combined with adaptive enhancement algorithms to obtain training corresponding to each type of texture classification model parameters,weconstruct a classifier,which achieves accurate and efficient wood texture classification. The experimental results show that the model error rate is about 4%,has higher accuracy and practicality than BP Neutral Networks,Support Vector Machine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.532
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHarbin Ligong Daxue xuebaoSame topicRemote Sensing and Land UseFrench-language works237,207