MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2378515134

Analysis on the Water Masses in the Arctic Ocean Based on the PHC3.0 Data Sets

2011· article· en· W2378515134 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Feng Feng-yun

Bibliographic record

VenueHydrographic Surveying and Charting · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArcticWater massOceanographyArctic dipole anomalyCircumpolar deep waterSalinityStructural basinSurface waterCanada BasinTemperature salinity diagramsCircumpolar starThe arcticGeologyEnvironmental scienceClimatologyNorth Atlantic Deep WaterThermohaline circulationArctic ice packGeomorphology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on the temperature and salinity data north of the 70°N from PHC3.0 data sets,the water masses in the Arctic ocean are analyzed using the cluster method and the bayes discrimination method.Four water masses are found in the Arctic ocean which are Arctic Surface water,Atlantic Intermediate water,Pacific water and Arctic deep water.Arctic Surface water spreads all over the surface of both Eurasian basin and the Canada basin,marked by lower temperature and lower salinity.Atlantic intermediate water mainly extends in the layer from about 200m to 900m,carried by the Arctic circumpolar boundary current it can spread over the Canadian basin.Affected by the water from the Pacific through the Bering Strait,Pacific water is relatively warmer and fresher,especially in summer.Arctic deep water is relatively uniform all over the basins with little seasonal variability.The salinity is about 34.95psu,while the temperature is about-0.3℃ in the Canada basin and-0.7℃ in the Eurasian basin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.270
Threshold uncertainty score0.543

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHydrographic Surveying and ChartingSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207