MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2378567761

Comment on the Case:GPX International Tire Corporation and Hebei Starbright Tire Co.,Ltd.,v. the Department of Commerce of United States for Its Countervailing Duty and Antidumping Duty Determinations on Pneumatic Off-the-road Tires from the P.R. China

2009· article· en· W2378567761 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sun Ling

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Business Research · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Law and Aviation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDutyStatuteCorporationBusinessInternational tradeLawCommissionChinaPolitical scienceFinance
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

American domestic importer(GPX INTERNATIONAL TIRE CORPORATION ) and foreign producer/exporter( Hebei Starbright Tire Co.,Ltd.) of pneumatic off-the-road(OTR) tires from the People's Republic of China(PRC) filed complaints contesting the Department of Commerce's countervailing duty(CVD) and antidumping duty(AD) determinations and the International Trade Commission's(ITC's) injury determinations. The Court of International Trade,Jane A. Restani,Chief Judge,held that:(1) unfair trade statutes did not bar Department from imposing CVDs on products from a nonmarket economy(NME) country;but(2) Department's methodology for applying CVD law to goods from the PRC that were subject to NME AD calculations was unreasonable. This article briefly introduced the facts of the case,analyzed the reasoning of the Court's decision,then commented on some legal issues of this case.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.122
Threshold uncertainty score0.242

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0180.006
Scholarly communication0.0080.005
Open science0.0060.003
Research integrity0.0690.037
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Business ResearchSame topicInternational Law and AviationFrench-language works237,207