MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2378586448

Criticality and Its Discontents

2007· article· en· W2378586448 on OpenAlexaff
Ming Du

Bibliographic record

VenueTime + Architecture · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicArchitecture and Computational Design
Canadian institutionsPrevention of Organ Failure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCritical reflectionSection (typography)CriticalityDivergence (linguistics)Reflection (computer programming)EpistemologySociologyHistoryPolitical sciencePhilosophyComputer scienceLinguisticsPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on an observation of the development of Western contemporary architecture,the essay focuses on current debates between“critical”and“post-critical”.It then argues that the surfacing of this interesting divergence of opinions does not so much constitute a conclusion to a story,but rather a beginning.The last section of this essay calls for a much more careful reflection before a new operative theory of practice can be achieved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.024
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.057
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.125

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0240.057
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0130.119
Scholarly communication0.0160.020
Open science0.0030.008
Research integrity0.0070.015
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTime + ArchitectureSame topicArchitecture and Computational DesignFrench-language works237,207