Analysis on the Characteristics of Periodic Anaerobic Exercise Performance of Male Volleyball Players in University
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tests on anaerobic exercise capability,including Quebec 10s,Wingate30s and katch120s,have been carried out among 46 elite volleyball players.The states,features and regularity of pre-match anaerobic exercise performance of higher-level female volleyball players with different positions in the court are discussed and the basic connection among the anaerobic exercise capabilities of higher-level male volleyball players with different positions in the court,including phosphagen metabolism,anabolic metabolism and glycolysis metabolism,is revealed.The result shows that phosphagen metabolism means most to middle blockers and liberos;anabolic metabolism combined with glycolysis metabolism is most important to setters;and outside spikers and opposite setters require more attention to glycolysis metabolism.It is suggested that the dynamic relationship among the three kinds of anaerobic exercise capabilities should be valued in future physical training.Applying various training methods and grading the training by court position and intensity level could serve as an important guidance in improving anaerobic exercise capabilities of professional players.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".