MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2378778782

Zinc Leaching Tail Slag Flotation Technology Optimization Study Preprocessing

2010· article· en· W2378778782 on OpenAlexaff
Xiangyang Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueGold Science and Technology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMinerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsFirst Quantum Minerals (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetallurgyLeaching (pedology)ZincSulfuric acidXanthateSulfurFroth flotationAdsorptionBeneficiationHydrometallurgyChemistryPulp and paper industryWaste managementMaterials scienceEnvironmental scienceEngineeringInorganic chemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to further improve the use efficiency of cyanide tail slag resources,to solve the problem of improving production technology index,According to the current market of lead and zinc concentrate requirements,using sulfuric acid slag,except came cyanogen,Adsorption pretreatment technology,A thick and Three esau Saul chose three times flotation process,Copper sulfate do disseminated activator,Isoamyl xanthate and sulfur n combination of collector,Effectively improve the technical indexes,Reduced the silica content,ore products,To increase the economic efficiency of enterprises made a solid step,causes the enterprise to get healthy and sustainable development。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.353
Threshold uncertainty score0.467

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGold Science and TechnologySame topicMinerals Flotation and Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207