MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2378834550

Influence of SSRIs(selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors)/citalopramon cognitive impairment in patients with stroke

2006· article· en· W2378834550 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Chen Changyu

Bibliographic record

VenueChongqing Yike Daxue xuebao · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitalopramRating scaleMini–Mental State ExaminationStroke (engine)Depression (economics)MedicineNeurologyCognitionMontreal Cognitive AssessmentPost-stroke depressionPsychologyCognitive impairmentTreatment and control groupsPsychiatryInternal medicineAntidepressantAnxietyDevelopmental psychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: To investigate the effect of early treatment with SSRIs/Citalopram on cognitive impairment in patients with stroke.Methods: A total of forty patients with cognitive impairment following stroke,in the Department of Neurology,Southwest Hospital of the Third Military Medical University,selected by the Mini-Mental State Examination,were randomly divided into treatment group and control group.All the patients received routine treatment,besides Citalopram were given to those in the treatment group.20mg Citalopram Hydrobromide Tablets would be given after breakfast everyday for 3 mouths?Patients in both groups were investigated with the Mini-Mental State Examination,Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression,National Institute of Health Stroke Scale and Barthel Index to examine the functions before and 1 and 3months after treatment respectively.Result: The improvement of cognitive function of patients in the treatment group was obviously superior to those in the control group(19.35±2.85,21.55±3.24,P0.05).Conclusion: Citalopram can promote the recovery of cognitive impairment in patients with stroke.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChongqing Yike Daxue xuebao→Same topicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery→French-language works237,207→