Clinic study of subjective well being and cognitive function in old men with cerebral infarction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To study the subjective well being and cognitive function in old men with cerebral infarction. Methods 48 old men with cerebral infarction and 48 controls were investigated. Subjective well being indexes were evaluated by positive factor, negative factor and total score of MUNSH(Memorial University of Newfoundland Scale of Happiness).Cognitive function were evaluated by the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale and Wechsler Adult clinical memory Scale. Results Compared with control group, patients with cerebral infarction had significant lower MUNSH total score, positive factor and cognitive function,and higher negative factor score of MUNSH. Patients with multiple cerebral infarction had even lower intellectual quotient and memorial quotient than single. Patients with left cerebral infarction had lower subjective well being than patients with right cerebral infarction. Conclusions Old men with cerebral infarction had lower subjective well being and cognitive function, and the reduced degree was correlated with the infarction position and area of cerebral infarction affected.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".