MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2378909557

Paclitaxel conjugate block copolymer nanoparticle formation by flash NanoPrecipitation

2006· article· en· W2378909557 on OpenAlexaff
Robert K. Prud’homme, Walid Saad, L.D. Mayer

Bibliographic record

Venue2006 NSTI Nanotechnology Conference and Trade Show - NSTI Nanotech 2006 Technical Proceedings · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicBlock Copolymer Self-Assembly
Canadian institutionsCelator Pharmaceuticals (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConjugateNanoparticleCopolymerChemistrySolubilityPaclitaxelAmphiphileDrugDrug carrierLinkerDrug deliveryCombinatorial chemistryNanotechnologyMaterials scienceOrganic chemistryPolymerPharmacologyComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Block copolymer drug nanoparticles have been explored for their potential in solubilizing hydrophobic drugs, reducing drug toxicity, and extending drug circulation times in vivo. Key factors in such applications involve the control of stability and nanoparticle size. Flash NanoPrecipitation, which was introduced recently, is an easily scalable technique that provides high solute loading, and controlled size nanoparticles using amphiphilic diblock copolymer stabilization. Using this technology, the anticancer drug paclitaxel conjugated to vitamin E succinate was formulated into stable and controlled size nanoparticles. Conjugation of the drug to vitamin E succinate to form a paclitaxel conjugate prior to mixing by Flash Nanoprecipitation reduces its solubility, and allows for the drug release rate to be controlled through the linker chemistry used to conjugate the drug to the nanoparticle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2006 NSTI Nanotechnology Conference and Trade Show - NSTI Nanotech 2006 Technical ProceedingsSame topicBlock Copolymer Self-AssemblyFrench-language works237,207