MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Phase II Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Rituximab in the Management of Patients with Relapsed or Refractory TTP

2014· article· en· W2378971247 on OpenAlexaffabout
S.R. Foley, David Barth, Donald M. Arnold, Kathryn E. Webert, Paul R. Yenson, John G. Kelton, William F. Clark, Lihua Li

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicComplement system in diseases
Canadian institutionsVancouver General HospitalLondon Health Sciences CentreMcMaster UniversityCanadian Apheresis GroupHamilton Health Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRituximabMedicineRefractory (planetary science)Internal medicineThrombotic thrombocytopenic purpuraGastroenterologyAdverse effectADAMTS13Phases of clinical researchSurgeryClinical trialPlateletLymphoma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: As many as 30-50% of patients diagnosed with Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (TTP) either relapse or become refractory to therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE). There remains a pressing need to evaluate novel treatments for these patients. Rituximab is a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that has demonstrated efficacy potentially by eliminating active B-lymphocytes and production of ADAMTS 13 inhibitor considered central to the pathogenesis of TTP. Intervention: We conducted a prospective multi-center phase II open-label trial in Canadian hospital-based apheresis units to evaluate the efficacy of rituximab in the management of adult patients with relapsed or refractory TTP. Functional and antigenic ADAMTS13 enzyme, inhibitor levels and anti-CD 20 were measured at initiation, 8, 12, 24 and 52-weeks as well as routine hematologic parameters, complete remission, rate of relapse, overall mortality and adverse events. Rituximab was administered intravenously once weekly for a total of 4 doses at 375 mg/m2 in eligible consenting patients. Results: Twenty refractory and 20 relapsing TTP patients were enrolled (N=40). A complete response (CR) was defined by a platelet count >150 x 109/L, an LDH <1.5 times the upper limit of normal, absence of progressive neurologic symptoms and no further need for TPE. At week 8, 77% of refractory patients and 90% of relapsed patients were in CR. At week 52, 15/20 refractory patients (3 deaths, 1 lost to follow-up) and 18/20 of relapsed patients (1 withdrew, 1 lost to follow-up) were alive and in CR. Of the 40 patients enrolled a total of 3 patients died; all in the refractory arm: two with functional ADAMTS13 <10% and detectable inhibitor. Two deaths were related to fungal infection (week 2) and active TTP (week 8). A third death was attributed to thrombotic complications at week 29. All refractory patients with normal ADAMTS13 enzyme at baseline had a complete response at week 8 and remained in remission for the remainder of follow-up (52 weeks). Despite being in complete hematological and clinical remission, relapsing TTP patients still had a positive inhibitor at 24 (50% of patients) and 52 weeks (10% of patients). All patients had < 3% CD 20+ B-lymphocytes at 8 and 12 weeks post rituximab. Median platelet counts in the refractory group recovered more slowly than in the relapsing TTP patients. By week 8 refractory TTP patients received a median of 26 plasma exchanges and relapsed patients received a median of 11(P<0.001). Conclusion: At the conclusion of this study the overall mortality rate was 8%, 15% (95% CI: 5% to 36%) for the refractory group and 0% (95% CI: 0% to 16%) for the relapsed group. Nine refractory patients were dialysis-dependent at baseline and only 2 had a serum creatinine >250 µmol/L and remained on dialysis at week 52. These patients had normal ADAMTS13 enzyme measurements throughout the time period of the study. Results of this study indicate that TPE and rituximab is an effective combination in patients with relapsed or refractory TTP. Disclosures Foley: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Lundbeck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Hoffman-LaRoche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Jansen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria. Off Label Use: Rituxan is a CD20-directed cytolytic antibody indicated for the treatment of patients with: •Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) (1.1) •Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) (1.2) • Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) in combination with methotrexate in adult patients with moderately-to severely-active RA who have inadequate response to one or more TNF antagonist therapies (1.3) . Arnold:GSK: Honoraria, Research Funding; Hoffman-LaRoche: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Clark:Alexion: Honoraria; CSN: Honoraria; ASN: Honoraria; Octapharm: Honoraria; Danone Research: Honoraria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.469
Threshold uncertainty score0.203

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicComplement system in diseasesFrench-language works237,207