MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2379196507

Community Structure of Soil Nematodes in Soybean Fields under Different Rotation Systems

2008· article· en· W2379196507 on OpenAlexaff
Han Xin-hua

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicNematode management and characterization studies
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgronomyAgroecosystemBiologyCrop rotationSoil biologyNo-till farmingNematodeSoil ecologyMineralization (soil science)Soil organic matterSoil waterAgricultureEcologySoil fertilitySoil biodiversityCrop
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Soil nematodes are numerous,species-rich and widely distribute,which play essential roles in soil organic matter decomposition,plant nutrient mineralization and nutrient circulation.More and more scholars pay attention to the important function of soil nematodes in agroecosystem.The study was conducted in the soybean field under continuous cropping (CS,15a),wheat-soybean-wheat-soybean (WSWS,15a) and wheat-maize-soybean (WMS,15a) rotation systems in Hailun Agricultural Ecology Experimental Station so as to elucidate the character of nematode distribution and dynamic change of nematode community.Totally 8 order,19 family and 43 genera nematodes were identified in soybean field and 29 genera nematodes were shared by each treatments,other 14 genera were different among samples in that their distribution were affected by the crops stubbles and soil environment.Total number of soil nematodes was exhibited low to high to low trend in CS and continous higher in WSWS and WMS at the sample stages.The number of Ditylenchus,Acrobeloides,Mesorhabditis,Protorhabditis,Panagrolaimus,Filenchus and Coslenchus was different among soybean rotation systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.439
Threshold uncertainty score0.226

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNematode management and characterization studiesFrench-language works237,207