MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2379215489

Geological characteristics and exploring analysis of the Coxheath porphyry Cu-Mo deposit buried in Sydney,Nova Scotia,Canada

2012· article· en· W2379215489 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gao Zhen-quan

Bibliographic record

VenueMineral Exploration · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNova scotiaGeologyAndesiteGeochemistryProterozoicBasaltVolcanic rockVolcanoMining engineeringSeismologyTectonicsOceanography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sydney's Cu-Mo deposit is located in northeastern of Appalachian metallogenic belt in Nova Scotia,Canada,have exposed and distributed a number of Proterozoic Coxheath-Group basaltic and andesitic volcanic rocks and acidic intrusive rocks,in which some veinlets and stocwork contained Cu-Mo,Cu-Au mine.Many acquired geological and geophysical datas show that the Cu-Mo,Cu-Au mine did not formed by the acidic intrusive exposed on ground and originated from deeper concealed intrusive rock,only,the acidic intrusive rocks exposed on ground are the country rock of Cu-Mo and Cu-Au mine,this new understanding and ideas will provide a chance of breakthrough of exploration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMineral ExplorationSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207