The Applicable Circumstances of Re-Arbitration Shall Be Limited to Procedural Matters
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Theoretically, the scope of judicial supervision on arbitration shall be limited to procedural matters and public order. Violation of the public order will lead to cancellation of the arbitral awards. Re-arbitration is one form of judicial supervision. Therefore, the applicable circumstances of re-arbitration shall be limited to procedural matters. Under UNCITRAL Model Law, English Arbitration Act and Arbitration Act of the United Sates, the applicable circumstances of re-arbitration are also mainly limited to procedural matters. Under Chinese law, for domestic arbitration cases, the applicable circumstances of re-arbitration are only limited to two matters related to evidence, which doesn't conform to the finality of arbitration award. The ideal solution shall make the applicable circumstances of re-arbitration be limited to procedural matters for both domestic cases and foreign cases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.028 | 0.045 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.011 | 0.010 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".