Study on Hard Seed Percentage and Seed Germination Characteristics of Chrotalaria pallida-a Plant for Revegetation of Deserted Mines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hard seed percentage,water absorption rate and germination rate of Chrotalaria pallida seeds had been determined after different physical or chemical treatments.Results:Chrotalaria pallida seeds had relatively high hard seed percentage;sandpaper rubbing for 5 minutes significantly increased water absorption rate;sandpaper rubbing for 1-7 minutes promoted seed germination rate,up to 36% for 5min rubbing,whereas the germination rate of un-rubbed seeds was merely 11.3%.Acetone treatment of the seeds for 1-4hours failed to promote germination,and germination rate decreased dramatically as the treatment time increased.Hydrogen peroxide also had no significant effect on seed germination.The rubbing treated seeds germinated well at ambient temperature(10-27℃),15℃,25℃,30℃,35℃.Light had no effect on germination,indicating the seeds of Chrotalaria pallida were non-photoblastic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".