Effect of mecobalamine in the treatment of herpes zoster in trigeminal nerve distribution area
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of mecobalamine in the treatment of herpes zoster in trigeminal nerve distribution area and preventing the neuralgia.Methods 40 cases were divided into two groups randomly,group treated with mecobalamine or vitamin B12,Other conventional treatments were the same. The simplified McGill pain scale (SF-MPQ) had been used to evaluate the pain before and after treatment.Results Before therapy there were no significant difference in the six targets (numbers of selected descriptors,scores of sensory,emotion and total of pain rating index(PRI),visual analogue scale (VAS)and present pain intensity (PPI) included in SF-MPQ. Fellow up 3 months,the differences between the two groups were significant (P0.05). None of the treatment group left neuralgia. Otherwise 5 patients of control group had varying degrees of neuralgia.Conclusion Mecobalamine has significantly effect on herpes zoster in trigeminal nerve distribution area. It can not only relieve acute pain but also prevent the neuralgia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".