MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2379636349

A New Method Based on Boundary Processing for Image Restoration

2008· article· en· W2379636349 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Min Ruijun

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrocomputer applications · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Image Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRingingRinging artifactsImage restorationComputer scienceWiener filterImage (mathematics)Computer visionImage processingArtificial intelligenceFilter (signal processing)Boundary (topology)A priori and a posterioriProcess (computing)Image qualityWiener deconvolutionAlgorithmMathematicsDeconvolutionBlind deconvolution
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Image restoration attempts to reconstruct or recover an image that has been degraded by using a priori knowledge of the degradation phenomenon.Wiener Filter is often used to recover the degraded image.The principle of the method expects to minimize the mean square error between the recovered image and original image.However,this method has some constrains,and it generates ringing effects easily.Based on the analysis of Wiener Filter,we propose a new method to process the boundary of the recovered image more efficiently.Experimental results indicate that the new method effectively reduces the ringing effects during the process of the image restoration,and gains the better quality of the recovered image than the old method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrocomputer applicationsSame topicAdvanced Image Processing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207