Infection Detection of Ginseng Seed and Disinfection Effect of Fungicides
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using plate method to carry on the seed surface and the seed borne fungi detection of 10 individual ginseng seed samples and to detect effect of four kinds of fungicides and two kinds of seed coating on the seed treatments.The result indicated that the seed samples carried groups of dominant fungi which were mainly Penicilium spp.,Fusarium spp.,Alternaria spp.Rhizoctonia spp.and groups of disadvantages fungi which were Cephalosporium spp.,Trichoderma spp.,Rhizopus spp.and Aspergillus spp.Fungi carrier rate of Ginseng seed was relatively high,shell carrier rate was 48% to 100%,seed interior was 40% to 100%.There was significant difference of fungi external carrier in different locations,the groups of dominant fungi and isolation frequency of fungi in seed embryo were consist with the result of the shell.Flusilazole,Thiram,Fludioxonil and 15% Hymexazol-Metalaxyl-Thiram Seed Coating Formulation(HMTSCF) were used for processing the ginseng seed with the good superficial disinfection effect,better than that of metalaxyl and hymexazol.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".