MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2380205403

Clinical observation of the relationship between asymptomatic cerebral infarction and cognitive dysfunction

2013· article· en· W2380205403 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yuan Li-h

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Diseases Monitor & Control · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAsymptomaticCognitionCerebral infarctionIncidence (geometry)CardiologyInternal medicineInfarctionIschemiaMyocardial infarctionPsychiatry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective Explore the relationship between asymptomatic cerebral infarction and cognitive dysfunction.Methods 40 patients with asymptomatic cerebral infarction patients and 40 controls were assessed Montreal Cognitive Assessment,And analyze infarct number,location and other different factors on cognitive function.Results Asymptomatic cerebral infarction in patients with cognitive dysfunction incidence(25%) was significantly higher Cortical infarction in patients with a high incidence of cognitive dysfunction in subcortical infarcts(P0.05);Multi-infarct patients with a high incidence of cognitive dysfunction in patients with single lesions(P0.05).Conclusion Asymptomatic cerebral infarction may cause cognitive dysfunction;Patients of cortex and multiple lesions are more vulnerable to have cognitive dysfunction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Diseases Monitor & Control→Same topicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases→French-language works237,207→