MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2380284614

How to Organize the Data Loading of SAP BI

2009· article· en· W2380284614 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Gaofeng Deng

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrocomputer applications · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBig Data and Business Intelligence
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceImplementationRealization (probability)ScheduleSet (abstract data type)Quality (philosophy)Business intelligenceEngineering managementDatabaseSoftware engineeringOperating system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SAP Business Intelligence(BI) is a very popular solution that is being recognized and used for intelligent enterprise management.In SAP implementations,the issue that the performance is not stable during the data loading will occur. This article will raise an actual case,the SAP BI system of a well-known company.Then it will provide a concrete analysis on the above-mentioned problem to show how it comes out.Thirdly,based on an in-depth study on SAP BI system,it will give an orderly and high-quality schedule of data loading via a set of tools.And thus it can keep a stable performance of data loading and help users solve the problem in a right way.Finally we will reach the ultimate realization of the intelligent enterprise management and make it develop in a continuing and health way.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.930
Threshold uncertainty score0.315

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrocomputer applicationsSame topicBig Data and Business IntelligenceFrench-language works237,207