MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2380484404

Changes of proline content and metabolism enzyme activities in wheat seedlings under Zn,Fe and Cu stresses in single or combination

2013· article· en· W2380484404 on OpenAlexaff
Yang Ying-l

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Northwest Normal University · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant nutrient uptake and metabolism
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProlineProline dehydrogenaseSeedlingChemistryEnzyme assayEnzymeMetabolismZincMetalDehydrogenaseFood scienceBiochemistryHorticultureAmino acidBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aims to investigate proline content and enzyme activities involved in proline metabolism in wheat(cv Ningchun 4)seedling roots exposed to Zn,Fe and Cu in single or combination.The results show that proline content increase under various heavy metal stresses,and except for Zn+Fe treatment,the increase rate of proline content under other combined treatments are high as compared with the single treatments.Root ornithine aminotransferase(OAT)activity in wheat seedlings increases compared with the control.Differently,glutamate kinase(GK)activity has no significant change under single heavy metal and Zn+Fe treatments,but the activity of this enzyme increases significantly in response to Zn+Cu,Fe+Cu and Zn+Fe+Cu treatments.Additionally,proline dehydrogenase(PDH)activity decreases under various heavy metal stresses.It can be inferred that the increase of proline content in wheat seedling roots is associated with the changes of OAT,GK and PDH activities induced by Zn,Fe and Cu treatments in single or combination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Northwest Normal UniversitySame topicPlant nutrient uptake and metabolismFrench-language works237,207