MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2380817649

A Review of the Plan of Raising Children and Adolescents Mental Health Service of Ontario in Canada

2013· review· en· W2380817649 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Wang Jian-gang

Bibliographic record

VenueWaiguo jiaoyu yanjiu · 2013
Typereview
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental healthGovernment (linguistics)Plan (archaeology)Service (business)Mental health serviceQuality (philosophy)Raising (metalworking)PsychologyBusinessPublic relationsNursingMedicinePolitical sciencePsychiatryMarketingGeographyEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Providing high quality of mental health services,diagnosing and intervening teenagers psychological problems in time and meeting the needs of the development of mental health are the three aspect contents of raising children and adolescents mental health service plan published by Ontario,Canada government on 22 June 2011.To achieve the goals,the government has made a commitment of $257 million investment from year of 2011 to 2013 to improve the teenagers' mental health service system.Analyzing the main contents and characteristics of the plan has the certain enlightenments to establish mental health services and make mental health service system perfect in our country.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.743
Threshold uncertainty score0.843

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWaiguo jiaoyu yanjiuSame topicChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207