The Effects of Penicillinum G Natricum on the Induction and Differentiation of Spathiphyllum Kochii Callus Tissue and the Growth of Its Test-tube Seedlings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A preliminary results were reported on the effects of penicillinum G natricum on the induction and differentiation of Spathiphyllum Kochii’s callus tissue,and on its seedling growth.The results showed that penicillinum G natricum has an inhibitory effect on inducing its leaf callus tissue,and has a promotive effect on the differentiation of its callus tissue; for the concentration of penicillinum G natricum 6 000 000 u·L -1 ,7.0 adventitious buds can be differentiated by each callus tissue,with the best effect; the medium with a lower penicillinum G natricum concentration has a promotive effect on the growth of the test tube seedlings and the development of its root system, while the medium with a higher penicillinum G natricum concentration has an inhibitory effect on the growth of the test tube seedlings,and this inhibitory effect become stronger with the increased concentration; for transplantation, the survival rate of test tube seedlings cultivated from the medium added a lower concentration of penicilinum G natricum (2 000 000 u·L -1 )is higher than that cultivated from the medium with no penicillinum G natricum.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".