MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2380879661

A Novel Rapid Prototyping Technology Technology System Products

2009· article· en· W2380879661 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMachine Design and Research · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicManufacturing Process and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModular designRapid prototypingArtifact (error)Component (thermodynamics)Manufacturing engineeringProduct (mathematics)Computer scienceSet (abstract data type)Systems engineeringEngineeringOperating systemMechanical engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper,a new approach called rapid prototyping of systems(RP-S) for product system development is prpposed to cope with the current pressure of short times to-market in both the manufacturing and service industry.RP-S works much in a similar way as rapid prototyping of components using polymer materials,primarily.The latter is named Rapid Prototyping(RP) technology in contemporary literature and is herein called Rapid Prototyping of Components(RP-C) due to the fact that its end product is a single component.Accordingly,RP-S uses a set of modular components and assembles into a system,rapidly.It is based on the Modular Plastic Module(MPM) technology in which a set of plastic modules is used to build an artifact system.RP-S will improve the efficiency of product design and then enhance the productivity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.946
Threshold uncertainty score0.407

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it