MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2380879661

A Novel Rapid Prototyping Technology Technology System Products

2009· article· en· W2380879661 on OpenAlexaff
Lin Wen-jun, Qian Zhi-qin, Yong Wang, Wenjun Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueMachine Design and Research · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicManufacturing Process and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModular designRapid prototypingArtifact (error)Component (thermodynamics)Manufacturing engineeringProduct (mathematics)Computer scienceSet (abstract data type)Systems engineeringEngineeringOperating systemMechanical engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper,a new approach called rapid prototyping of systems(RP-S) for product system development is prpposed to cope with the current pressure of short times to-market in both the manufacturing and service industry.RP-S works much in a similar way as rapid prototyping of components using polymer materials,primarily.The latter is named Rapid Prototyping(RP) technology in contemporary literature and is herein called Rapid Prototyping of Components(RP-C) due to the fact that its end product is a single component.Accordingly,RP-S uses a set of modular components and assembles into a system,rapidly.It is based on the Modular Plastic Module(MPM) technology in which a set of plastic modules is used to build an artifact system.RP-S will improve the efficiency of product design and then enhance the productivity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMachine Design and ResearchSame topicManufacturing Process and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207