Phylogenetic inference and peristome evolution in haplolepideous mosses, focusing on Pseudoditrichaceae and Ditrichaceae<i>s. l</i>.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pseudoditrichum mirabile, the only species of Pseudoditrichaceae, has been known for a long time from a single collection from the Canadian Arctic. Its systematic position remained enigmatic due to similarity in gametophyte structure with Ditrichaceae, a family that has simple peristomes, whereas the peristome in Pseudoditrichum is double. Due to this difference, Pseudoditrichum was classified in either Funariales or Bryales. A recent discovery of this species in the Anabar Plateau in northern Siberia has allowed its phylogenetic position to be tested based on plastid rps4 and rbcL and mitochondrial nad5 sequences. The results of this research reject the earlier hypotheses. Instead, the molecular analysis resolves Pseudoditrichum in a clade with Chrysoblastella chilensis (formerly Ditrichaceae) in the haplolepideous lineage. The peristome of Pseudoditrichum is of a previously unknown type with a fully developed exostome and hyaline endostome elements opposite the exostome teeth, based not on the 4:2:4 peristomial formula, but on 4:2:3. Double peristomes of the same type, albeit rather strongly reduced, occur in Catoscopium, Chrysoblastella, Distichium and Ditrichum flexicaule. The polyphyly of Ditrichaceae is confirmed by molecular phylogenetic analysis, and Ditrichum flexicaule and D. gracile are segregated into the new genus Flexitrichum and family Flexitrichaceae. An independent status of the recently resurrected family Distichiaceae is supported, and segregation of Chrysoblastella and Saelania into new monospecific families is proposed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".