MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2381031674

The Dangers,Causes and Countermeasures of the Primary Tendency of Pre-school Education

2013· article· en· W2381031674 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Guangzhou University · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Methods and Practices
Canadian institutionsEducation and Early Childhood Development
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHappinessPsychologyPersonalityIdeal (ethics)Government (linguistics)Primary educationDevelopmental psychologyCountermeasureSocial psychologyPolitical sciencePedagogyLawEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article first analyzes the dangers of the primary tendency of pre-school education,including being weary of study before going to school,repressing nature and depriving of happiness of children,running contrary to and making damage to children's physiological health,blowing self-confidence and healthy personality,one-sided development and missing the critical period. Then,it discusses the causes and development of the tendency. Finally,it puts forward solutions to the tendency:( 1) The government should increase the efforts of managing the tendency so as to form a favorable external environment;( 2) primary school teachers should be familiar with the law of development of young children and reform the lower primary education;( 3) pre-school education workers should stick to their ideal of education.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.099
Threshold uncertainty score0.260

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it