Clinical observation on benzalkonium bromide solution preventing skin wound healing and scar treatment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: To observe 0.1% benzalkonium bromide solution on the prevention and treatment of skin wound healing and scar treatment.METHODS: 974 cases of trauma were randomly divided into treatment group and control group each for 487 cases.0.5% of the complex with iodine solution was used for skin disinfection.3% hydrogen peroxide solution,0.9% sodium chloride injection,0.1% benzalkonium bromide solution were continuously used to clean the wound.The 0.1% benzalkonium bromide solution was wet compressed after suture with bandage wounds,once every 2 days to wound healing in treatment group.3% hydrogen peroxide solution and 0.9% sodium chloride injection were used to clear the wound in the control group,then bandage usually.The long-term healing scar of two groups were observed.RESULTS:The Vancouver scar scale of two groups had significantly difference in 12 months after skin wound healing,the treatment group was lower.CONCLUSION: 0.1% benzalkonium bromide solution has preventive effect on the skin and scar formation after wound healing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".