MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2381068101

Research Backdoor Hidden Technology Based on Oracle Trigger

2015· article· en· W2381068101 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Huaiyin Teachers College · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTechnology and Security Systems
Canadian institutionsLa Cité Collégiale
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBackdoorOracleComputer scienceCloud computingJavaOracle Unified MethodBlock (permutation group theory)Computer securityOperating systemStatement (logic)DatabaseProgramming languageWorld Wide WebMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Because of oracle cloud computing technology occupying an important seat in the cloud computing market and the feature of oracle database in the basic position of the oracle cloud computing infrastructure solutions,We put forward a backdoor hidden technology based on oracle trigger for new attack and defense technology research in cloud computing environments. in short,we insert java stored procedure call statement block in specified trigger under the current oracle account,when the certain operation is taking place in the information system,the java stored procedure call statement block is running because of the oracle trigger,and for the purpose of executing external program through the java stored procedure,so the backdoor program is running which is hiding in the operation system,otherwise when we do the normal operation in the information system,the trigger perform the original job,and the backdoor is taking long time static latent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.176
Threshold uncertainty score0.723

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it