MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2381284762

A Feminist Reading of the Survival Theme in Anne of Green Gables

2009· article· en· W2381284762 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Chen Xiu-jun

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sichuan University of Science & Engineering · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFolklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTheme (computing)Reading (process)FriendshipPerspective (graphical)Competition (biology)Gender studiesCapital (architecture)SociologyPeriod (music)HistoryLawAestheticsPolitical scienceSocial sciencePhilosophyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Survival is the permanent central of Canadian literature all the time.As an influential and international Canadian literature classic,the success of Anne of Green Gables primarily lies in that Montgomery reveals the phenomenon of Canadian people in the corresoonding period of Anne who is an representative from her own particular female perspective.Namely,different layers of states:individuals persistently pursuing in incomplete circumstances,friendship gradually merging in pluaral competition,the family being forced to make a variation by external capital and the society in the colonial background losing tradition,are described extremely vividly and incisively.Consequently,to explore the survival theme in Anne of Green Gables will be beneficial not only to grasping the essence of Canadian literature,but also to understanding the national characteristics of Canadian people more accurately.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.876
Threshold uncertainty score0.250

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0150.014
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Sichuan University of Science & EngineeringSame topicFolklore, Mythology, and Literature StudiesFrench-language works237,207