MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2381319159

Literature Review: The Cause, Pattern and Evolvement of Producer Services' Agglomeration

2013· article· en· W2381319159 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Gao Yun-shen

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Business Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicRegional Economic and Spatial Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomies of agglomerationBusinessIndustrial organizationService (business)Cluster (spacecraft)Production (economics)Tertiary sector of the economyMode (computer interface)Economic geographyCluster analysisCommerceMarketingEconomicsComputer scienceEconomic growthMicroeconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since the 1970s,foreign scholars have studied the clustering of producer services based on the mode of manufacturing industrial cluster,and thought that factors of production,demand conditions,system,environment and location choice were the main causes of agglomeration.With the wide use of information and communication technology and improvement of knowledge-intensive,producer services had a significant increase in the degree of integration of the whole industrial chain and industry-related effects as well as reduction of the requirement of geographic location.On the basis of traditional agglomeration mode,producer services emerged in a virtual,ecological and chain cluster agglomeration pattern.This paper reviews the domestic and foreign research on the cause,pattern and relation between cluster and diffusion of the producer service industries,and then gives some comments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0150.038
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Business ResearchSame topicRegional Economic and Spatial AnalysisFrench-language works237,207