Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective:To investigate the psychotherapy effects on trichloromethyl carbonate poisoning.Methods:Forty-five patients were randomly divided into the treatment group and control group.These cases of the treatment group were treated with taking oxygen,antispasmodic,relieving asthma,expectorant,prevention infection,mechanical ventilation(for severe cases),conventional treatment combined with psychological treatment.However,cases in control group were only treated with conventional treatment.All cases were measured with Toronto Alexithymia scale,Self-Rating Anxiety Scale and Self-rating depression scale at 7 and 14 days before and after treatment,then data were conducted contrast analysis.Results:All cases had varying degrees anxiety and depression symptoms,and their differences had not statistically significant before treatment(P0.05).The anxiety and depression improved of treatment group were better than that of the control group at 7days after treatment,and the differences had statistically significant(P0.05).Before and after treatment,the degree of state of an illness of all cases had no significant difference(P0.05).Conclusions:The cases with trichloromethyl carbonate poisoning have varying degrees anxiety and depression symptoms.Conventional therapy combined with psychotherapy can shorten the course of treatment,and improve the cure rate of patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".