Experiment of the Macromolecular Chitosan to Remove Mercury in the Flue Gas of Coal Combustion
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A one-dimension furnace test bench experiment is conducted to study the Chitosan sorbent’s adsorption efficiency of mercury in coal-fired flue gas. In this work, the method of Ontario Hydro and Atomic Absorption Spectrometry is used to analyze the form distribution and content of the mercury in the flue gas of coal combustion. At the same time, three kinds of modified Chitosan(CS)sorbents are prepared to remove the mercury in the flue gas. The results show that the element mercury is more than bivalent mercury and the ratio is 3:2. The CS sorbents can adsorb Hg0. The mercury adsorption efficiency is 96.34% at 80℃, especially the CS can remove the SOx and NOx simultaneously. The chitosan, it’s a new and effective adsorption in the field of heavy metal removing in flue gas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it