MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2381606271

Of the Philosophical Ideas of the Yangzhou School of Thought

2002· article· en· W2381606271 on OpenAlexaff
Guo Ming

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Yangzhou University · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicCognitive Science and Education Research
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeudalismCriticismEpistemologyPhilosophySociologyLawPoliticsPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The philosophical ideas of Wang Zhong\,Ruan Yuan and Jiao Xun are fairly characteristic and creative.Their criticism of the Confucian orthodox notions,the feudal ethics and Confucian schools,represented by Zhu Xi and Cheng Yi constitutes the important components and sparks of the philosophy characterizing the Yangzhou School of Thought.In response to the modern scientific mentality,the elucidation Ruan Yuan and Jiao Xun venture on pursuit of knowledge by the study of physical world and the theory of human nature highlights the great role that the practical,evolutionary and flexible approaches play in cognition.They vigorously prove that the Yangzhou School of Thought suppasses the schools of Wu and Wan in culture and thought.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.237
Threshold uncertainty score0.662

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Yangzhou UniversitySame topicCognitive Science and Education ResearchFrench-language works237,207