MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2381880595

The Creation and Application of Urban Design System in Wuhan City

2010· article· en· W2381880595 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Cheng Gang

Bibliographic record

VenueChengshi guihua huikan · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicRemote Sensing and Land Use
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUrban planningQuarter (Canadian coin)Urban designEnvironmental planningLand-use planningCity blockChinaEnvironmental design and planningSite planStatutory lawBusiness system planningSpatial planningUrban morphologyRegional planningGeographyArchitectural engineeringCivil engineeringBusinessEngineeringPolitical scienceLand useProcess management
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper reviews the evolvement and application of urban design ideas in the past in Wuhan.It introduces the structure of Wuhan urban planning system in terms of master planning,district planning,quarter planning and street block planning.The paper also summarizes the statutory planning system in different scales as well as its application in planning administration and its effect in shaping an urban spatial morphology.This paper is expected to shed light on the research and application of urban design system in other cities in China.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.288
Threshold uncertainty score0.342

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChengshi guihua huikanSame topicRemote Sensing and Land UseFrench-language works237,207