Cl inical Observation of Tiaojitongdu Acupuncture Therapy on Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the curative and analgesic effect of Tiaojitongdu acupuncture therapy treating nonspecific low back pain. Methods: 100 patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: therapy group Tiaojitongdu acupuncture therapy) and control group(routine acupuncture therapy). After 3 periods of treatment,curative effect,half a year relapse rate and the change of scores in SF-MPQ(short-form of Mcgill pain questionnaire) were evualted. Results: Compared with routine acupuncture therapy,Tiaojitongdu acupuncture therapy showed better curative effect(P 0.05),which reduced pain(P 0.05)and prevented relapse rate more effectively. Conclusion: Tiaojitongdu acupuncture therapy is effective in treating nonspecific low back pain which deserves to further study and promotion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".