MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2382250424

Soil aggregate and organic carbon contents with different surface mulching under dryland farming system

2015· article· en· W2382250424 on OpenAlexaff
Xi Fu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental and Agricultural Sciences
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMulchStrawSoil carbonTotal organic carbonAgronomyPlastic filmEnvironmental scienceSoil waterField experimentChemistryAnimal scienceSoil scienceEnvironmental chemistryBiologyLayer (electronics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[Objectives]Study on the effect of different mulching treatments on soil aggregates and their relationships with soil organic carbon,will help selecting the sustainable mulching measures for the loess hilly region of China.[Methods]The field experiment was carried out in 2008.Four treatments were included as control without mulching treatment(CK),straw mulching at a rate of 9000 kg/hm2(M1),straw mulching at a rate of 4500 kg/hm2(M2) and plastic film mulching(PM) during winter wheat growing season.Soil samples were collected at layers of 0-10 cm and 10-20 cm in 2014 after crop harvest,soil aggregates were separated into 5mm,5-2 mm,2-1 mm,1-0.5 mm,0.5-0.25 mm and 0.25 mm and were determined by using dry sieving method and wet sieving method.The mean weight diameter(MWD) and geometric mean diameter(GMD) were calculated and the content of soil organic carbon was also measured.[Results]1) Compared with CK,soil mechanical-stable macroaggregates content was increased by straw mulching,the increase in the 0-10 cm soil layer was 5.1%in M1 and 2.0%in M2 treatment,respectively.Both straw and plastic film mulching improved the macroaggregate contents in 10-20 cm soil layer,with significant increase of 7.6%,4.3%and 3.1%in M1,M2 and PM,respectively.2) Compared with CK,the contents of water-stable macroaggregates(0.25 mm) in M1 and M2 were increased by 6.8%and 5.0%in 0-10 cm soil layer,respectively,mulching with plastic film had no significant effect.3) All the straw mulching and plastic film mulching treatments improved the values of MWD and GMD in 0-10 cm soil layer significantly.Compared with CK,the soil MWD was increased by 47.8%,24.7%and 24.6%,and the GMD was by 48.9%,34.8%and 31.6%in M1,M2 and PM treatments.4) Soil organic carbon content was increased by straw mulching.Soil organic carbon content was in turn 11.9%and 6.3%higher in 0-10 cm layer,and 4.2%and 4.5%higher in 10-20 cm layer in M1 and M2 than in CK,respectively.Plastic film mulching had no effect on soil organic carbon sequestration.Soil organic carbon content was significantly correlated with 0.25 mm size water-stable aggregates content at 0-10 cm depth.[Conclusions]In the perspective of soil structure,mulching with crop straw rather than with plastic film could improve soil structures and soil quality through increasing the quantity of water-stable macroaggregate and total soil organic carbon content.Straw mulching at a rate of 9000 kg/hm2 is superior to other rate and can be regarded as a reasonable cultivation practice in the Loess Plateau.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.167
Threshold uncertainty score0.329

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnvironmental and Agricultural SciencesFrench-language works237,207