MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2382282993

Development of wild thorn pear drink

2007· article· en· W2382282993 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nan Ya

Bibliographic record

VenueBeverage industry · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFermentation and Sensory Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryStarchPollenFood sciencePEARPulp (tooth)BotanyBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With basic liquor,wild thorn pear juice,bee pollen and flavouring as the materials,the processing technology for nutritional juice containing alcohol was explored through orthogonal experiments,and the wall-breaking of bee pollen was studied.The results of the experiments on wall-breaking showed that the wall-breaking rate was above 98.5% when the pollen was cultured by Aspergillus at pH5.4 and 55℃,and degradation was carried out with 10% NaCl for 56 h.The experiments on basis liquor indicated that precipitation could be completed in 18 h if 20° Canada pulp liquor was treated with 1.35mg/100ml sodium alginate and 180mg/100ml soluble starch,and most fatty acid esters were completely removed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.765
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBeverage industrySame topicFermentation and Sensory AnalysisFrench-language works237,207