MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2382381279

Effect of Deepfreeze and Ultraviolet on Bulbs Germination and Growth of Konjac

2010· article· en· W2382381279 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yang Xiu-lian, Yang Jian-ping, Xingchun Wu, Cun Xiangqin, Qingyun Zhao, Xie Shi-qing

Bibliographic record

VenueSeed · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFlowering Plant Growth and Cultivation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGerminationUltravioletYield (engineering)HorticultureNear ultravioletErwiniaBiologyChemistryBotanyMaterials scienceBacteriaOptoelectronicsComposite material
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pretreatment those konjac's bulbs by deepfreeze and ultraviolet for different time.Afterward,compared and investigated the bulbs germination characteristics,growth,disease resistance,photosynthesis and yield.The results as follow:deepfreeze and ultraviolet obviously postponed the germination of the bulbs,but its growth was influenced little,and the yield was near and high.The study result showed that deepfreeze and ultraviolet treatment could control the occurrence of erwinia carotovora effectively,and the best effect was pretreatment deepfreeze at 5℃ for 30days and ultraviolet for 5hours.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.592
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeedSame topicFlowering Plant Growth and CultivationFrench-language works237,207