Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper,the historical and future consumptions of CFC-11 and CFC-12 in China are estimated based on the consumption data and phase-out process in all CFC-11 and CFC-12 application sectors such as household refrigeration,industrial and commercial refrigeration,automobile air conditioners,as well as the aerosol,tobacco and foam sectors.Annual emissions in the past and future were calculated according to the consumptions and corresponding emission equations.Results show that the total consumptions of CFC-11 and CFC-12 in China are 397,900 and 409,700 tons respectively during the period from 1978 when the CFCs first came into use to the year when CFCs will be eliminated.This means that the CFC-11 and CFC-12 consumptions in China are 197,800 tons less than the required target of the Protocol.The total emissions of CFC-11 and CFC-12 in China are 4.66% and 3.16% of global emissions from 1950 to 1999,with per capita emission and per unit area emission much lower than the global average.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".