Application of MoCA in the screening of MCI in elderly patients
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
[Objective]To explore the application of Montreal cognitive Assessment( MoCA) in the screening of mild cognitive impairment( MCI) in elderly patients.[Methods]A total of 56 MCI patients were selected as MCI group and 50 adults with normal cognition as control group. Their cognitive function was assessed according to the MoCA and MMSE scales. And the results were analyzed.[Results]The total score of MoCA was significantly lower than the total score of MMSE in MCI group and control group( P 0.01). The sensitivity and specificity of MoCA and MMSE were 96.4% and 84%,35.7% and 100%,respectively in MCI screening. The total MoCA and its sub-items were significantly different between the MCI group and the control group( P 0. 01),except for the fixed orientation( P 0. 01).[Conclusion]MoCA is a highly sensitive scale for MCI screening,which allows comprehensive assessment of the cognitive function of MCI patients,and it is more sensitive in screening MCI than MMSE.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it