MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2382721265

Constructing Equipment Platform at the Disciplinary Cluster Background for Teaching and Rresearch

2007· article· en· W2382721265 on OpenAlex
DU Shou-xu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch and Exploration in Laboratory · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHigher Education and Teaching Methods
Canadian institutionsL'Alliance Boviteq
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConstruct (python library)DisciplineSubject (documents)Engineering managementComputer scienceEngineeringCluster (spacecraft)Knowledge managementWorld Wide WebSociology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper discussed the necessity to construct equipments platform at the same subject background of teaching and research disciplines.It is of great advantage to improve teaching,research and social services,and reduce repetitive purchase,enhance efficiency of equipments.The six measures to construct the equipments platform include organizational structure of the platform,experts in decision-making,information platform,disciplinary group demonstration,utilization evaluation and personnel echelon.It explored a model to construct equipments platform at the same subject background of teaching and research disciplines,that adapt to the practical situation of our university.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.466
Threshold uncertainty score0.911

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.186
GPT teacher head0.472
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it