Bibliographic record
Abstract
Castor seed size varies greatly due to breed,has yet to see molecular biology research on castor bean size traits associated with the development. In this experiment,32 castor seeds of different sizes as research material,with U25( 55) uniform design for seed size traits RAPD-PCR reaction system and conditions were optimized. The optimal reaction system: 25 μL system,10 × Buffer 2. 7 μL,d NTP 2. 4 μL,Mg2 +2. 4 μL,DNA 1. 7 μL,primers 1. 9μL,Taq polymerase 2. 0 μL,dd H2 O 11. 9 μL. The best reaction conditions were: 94 ℃ 150 s; 94 ℃ 45 s,39 ℃65 s,72 ℃ 90 s,35 cycles; 72 ℃ 10 min; 4 ℃ preservation. With SB-002 primer( nucleotide sequence( 5'-3') :TGCCGAGCTG),using the best reaction system and conditions,screening a different band in the largest grain castor seeds,sequencing results were compared in the NCBI found with high yield rice genome DNA,mRNA or c DNA homology of 100%. Therefore,It can be concluded that the different band relevant to castor seed yield,laid the foundation for the relevant molecular mechanisms of castor seed size traits studied.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".