MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2382956916

On the Management of School Curriculum within the Context of Three-Level Curriculum Management

2004· article· en· W2382956916 on OpenAlex
Jin Dong-hai

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Northwest Normal University · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHigher Education and Teaching Methods
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumEmergent curriculumCurriculum mappingCurriculum theoryContext (archaeology)AutonomyCurriculum-based measurementCurriculum developmentMathematics educationPedagogyTask (project management)SociologyPsychologyPolitical scienceEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

School curriculum management refers to the management of national curriculum, local curriculum and school-based curriculum so as to achieve the goals of basic education. The basic task of school curriculum is to ensure the implementation of the three-level curriculum. The curriculum management at school level should be the core of curriculum management, which depends on the autonomy and special essence of educational and instructional activities. Constructing the system of school curriculum management,needs to establish a complete system of school curriculum planning and decision-making, school curriculum development, school curriculum implementation and evaluation, as well as strengthen the establishment of regulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.920
Threshold uncertainty score0.463

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it